Post Author
Be the first to know about our upcoming events, new publications and recently added commentary.

Sign up to our newsletter

We only send emails once every two weeks to keep you up to date.
Sign Up

Economic benefits of Labour plan to provide free broadband for all

Post Author

This letter from 13 PEF Council members appeared in the Guardian.

We write to support the proposal from the Labour party for a public programme to provide rapid internet service to the entire population (Broadband ‘communism’? They said that about the NHS, Journal, 19 November). This project would have a high social and economic rate of return, especially at current borrowing rates.

Since it would be socially profitable, the objection that the proposal is an election “giveaway” should not be taken seriously – that is not an objection raised for other infrastructure projects such as airports and motorways.

Arguments from self-interested corporations that a public sector programme would discourage private sector investment should be seen as unfounded special pleading. This pleading also ignores the fact that this network would create many more opportunities for web content providers to profit in a space where something approaching a real market operates, and is, therefore, decidedly selective in its view. Finally, to claim that this is an activity more appropriate for the private sector is a political assertion that fails to take account of the manifest failure of private companies to provide a broadband network accessible to all.

Patrick Allen Chair, Progressive Economy Forum, John Weeks Emeritus professor of Development Economics, Soas, Ha-Joon Chang University reader in the political economy of development, Cambridge University, Danny Dorling Halford Mackinder professor of geography, Oxford University, Susan Himmelweit Emeritus professor of economics, Open University, Will Hutton Principal of Hertford College, Oxford University, Johnna Montgomerie Reader in international political economy, King’s College London, Richard Murphy Professor of political economy, City, University of London, Guy Standing Professorial research associate, Soas, Sue Konzelmann Reader in management, Birkbeck, University of London, Stephany Griffith-Jones Financial markets director at the Initiative for Policy Dialogue, Columbia University, Daniela Gabor Professor of economics and macrofinance, University of the West of England, Natalya Naqvi Assistant professor in international political economy, LSE

Related content

Labour should not back another Job Furlough

The policy is uniquely flawed, with multiple faults. Of course, if government throws over £60 billion of subsidies to a minority of firms and workers, that will be popular with the recipients. But a scheme should be judged by what it does for the many, not the few, and for its opportunity cost.

Stewart Lansley – Why luxury capitalism is the enemy of social progress

The ‘great widening’ of the last four decades – with the gains from growth increasingly colonised by the few – has had severe economic and social consequences. Intense concentrations of wealth have brought the return of ‘luxury capitalism’, with – as in the nineteenth century – the pattern of economic activity skewed by an over-rich and over-powered class, and resources deflected to meeting their demands.

PEF Newsletter

Receive updates on our latest news and events.

We use cookies to personalise your experience, by using our website you agree to the terms and conditions set out in our privacy policy.