{"id":2120,"date":"2018-12-11T17:15:25","date_gmt":"2018-12-11T17:15:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/box5782.temp.domains\/~progrgc9\/staging\/?p=2120"},"modified":"2019-05-28T15:52:48","modified_gmt":"2019-05-28T15:52:48","slug":"bbc-analysis-of-labour-market-statistics-misses-the-point","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/progressiveeconomyforum.com\/development\/blog\/bbc-analysis-of-labour-market-statistics-misses-the-point\/","title":{"rendered":"BBC analysis of labour market statistics misses the point"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>There are no big surprises in this month\u2019s round of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ons.gov.uk\/employmentandlabourmarket\/peopleinwork\/employmentandemployeetypes\/bulletins\/uklabourmarket\/october2018#average-weekly-earnings\">labour market statistics<\/a> from the ONS. Very little has changed since August, when I wrote about the UK\u2019s dismal wage and productivity growth \u2013 ultimately a result of<a href=\"2018\/08\/14\/august-employment\/\"> labour market power imbalances and underinvestment<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Today, I just want to say a brief word about the uncritical interpretation of these statistics in the media, using the BBC\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/news\/business-46520876\">article on the new figures<\/a> as an example. The headline is \u201cwages accelerate to fastest pace since 2008\u201d, and the introduction reads:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><em>\u201c<strong>Wages are continuing to rise at their highest level for nearly a decade,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ons.gov.uk\/employmentandlabourmarket\/peopleinwork\/employmentandemployeetypes\/articles\/labourmarketeconomiccommentary\/december2018\">the latest official Office for National Statistics figures show.<\/a><\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><em>Compared with a year earlier, wages excluding bonuses, were up by 3.3% for the three months to October, the biggest rise since November 2008. Average weekly wages are \u00a3495 &#8211; the highest since 2011, when adjusted for inflation.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><em>The number of people in work rose by 79,000 to 32.48 million, a record high. That is the highest figure since records began in 1971.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><em>Unemployment increased by 20,000 to 1.38 million, although the margin of error is 70,000 and the total is still lower than a year ago. The number of unemployed men increased by 27,000, while the number of unemployed women fell by 8,000.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><em>The reason both employment and unemployment have increased is a result of the UK&#8217;s rising population and more people joining the labour force, such as students and older people.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p>First, it is <em>nominal <\/em>wages that are growing at their fastest <em>rate <\/em>for nearly a decade. But real wages \u2013 wages after inflation \u2013 are what really matter, as they tell us far more about workers\u2019 living standards.<a href=\"#_ftn1\" name=\"_ftnref1\">[1]<\/a> Here, the picture is much more dismal. Real wages grew by just over 1% in the past year \u2013 slower than in most of 2015\/16, and well below 1945-2007 average of 2.5%.<a href=\"#_ftn2\" name=\"_ftnref2\">[2]<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Indeed, this meek growth has not been enough to compensate for the falls in real wages during and following the recession, conferring onto the UK the dubious honour of being one of the only OECD countries (along with Greece) to have experienced negative wage growth since the Global Financial Crisis (GFC). So yes, weekly wages are at their \u201chighest\u201d since 2011, but this is not cause for celebration. <strong>If wage growth had kept up with the WW2-GFC trend, wages would be approximately ~28% higher than their current levels.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Instead of explaining this broader context in their introduction to the piece, the BBC decided to note that the number of people in work is at its highest since records began in 1971: unsurprising, given that the population of the UK has steadily risen by 11m people over this time period. Choosing to devote space to such a facile observation is questionable at the very least.<\/p>\n<p>Though the BBC did add critical commentary from Margaret Greenwood, Frances O\u2019Grady and others over the course of the day (though without timestamping these contributions\/noting that the article had been edited <em>ex post<\/em>, I might add), the fact that the earliest, and likely the most-read <a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20181211103247\/https:\/www.bbc.co.uk\/news\/business-46520876\">version of the BBC article<\/a> contained no such counterpoint is serious cause for concern.<\/p>\n<p>The overarching issue is that wage and productivity performance has been so dismal over the past decade that it allows the Government to pass off news that would be considered miserable by any reasonable standards as fantastic. Employment Minister Alok Sharma, for example, cited \u201cwages outpacing inflation for the ninth month in a row\u201d as a sign of \u201cthe enduring strength of our jobs market\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>The fact that avoiding real wage falls for a grand total of nine months \u2013 outside of recession time, no less &#8211; is touted as a mark of enduring strength highlights that something is seriously wrong with the UK labour market. This is why continuing to draw attention to the wider context is so important.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref1\" name=\"_ftn1\">[1]<\/a> One commentator pointed out that higher nominal wage growth does benefit indebted households; this is true, but it is stagnant real wage growth that is driving the increase in consumer debt in the first place.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref2\" name=\"_ftn2\">[2]<\/a> Using the \u2018real consumption earnings\u2019 time series from the Bank of England\u2019s <em>A Millennium of Macroeconomic Data.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Photo credit from previous page: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/acraigmile\/14916998171\/in\/photolist-oJavRD-5rnjVq-2ghFVT-2gg8QT-2gh73K-fJxjS-2gjqGz-2ggA94-2BoG6K-e5ioCS-Vv8MKC-2gjmEH-2ghs2B-2gmKfG-2gn6bN-2gmzyf-fkrCXD-2gn1dG-2gjx6e-ayC9Ph-aF9FWZ-2gndNE-6by2fE-22CSzgG-844GmC-69WtUy-pVBghQ-2gkzBd-fB8CJ1-5zZds1-2ggtNi-2gmbfh-ppeEY-2ge8Rn-82PTsw-4XnSL7-4y9CvX-7RTyxi-fkFR31-fJvhe-fJsg1-5RdKCu-9UcfEP-ZGpF4L-cUDGo-dnrAk8-2gefpP-2gmSp5-2gmxvY-6aUUWG\">Flickr \/ Ali Craigmile<\/a><\/em><em><br \/>\n<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Avoiding real wage falls for a grand total of nine months &#8211; outside of recession time, no less &#8211; is not cause for celebration.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":2122,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"default","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"default","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[222,210,213],"class_list":["post-2120","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-economics-journalism","tag-statistics","tag-work-and-pay"],"acf":[],"authors":[{"term_id":166,"user_id":0,"is_guest":1,"slug":"michael-davies","display_name":"Michael Davies"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/progressiveeconomyforum.com\/development\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2120","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/progressiveeconomyforum.com\/development\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/progressiveeconomyforum.com\/development\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/progressiveeconomyforum.com\/development\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/progressiveeconomyforum.com\/development\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2120"}],"version-history":[{"count":17,"href":"https:\/\/progressiveeconomyforum.com\/development\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2120\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4281,"href":"https:\/\/progressiveeconomyforum.com\/development\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2120\/revisions\/4281"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/progressiveeconomyforum.com\/development\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2122"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/progressiveeconomyforum.com\/development\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2120"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/progressiveeconomyforum.com\/development\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2120"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/progressiveeconomyforum.com\/development\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2120"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}